The Spanish philosopher had it pretty much figured out right. He lived through war-torn Europe in the 1930s and 1940s, and those hunting thoughts probably offered him some solace while the whole world went crazy as Hitler and Mussolini ranted and caused untold suffering and death for millions of people.
Hunters still live in somewhat troubled times, and we face problems more immediate than having to listen to political hype and mind-bending thoughts of coping with complex social issues such as the ongoing political spin that has replaced news these days. We hunters face a world of increasing numbers, decreasing acres of available land for sporting use, a global need for fuel and the wrath of uninformed anti-hunter's. Michigan's residents live in a nearly bankrupt state, and politicians all seem intent to turn its citizens into people as financially and morally bankrupt as they are.
For many people, there is a very real fear of losing a job (for those that still have one). For others, trying to find a job and the high cost of medicine is a major troubling issue. For some, finding enough food to eat or staying cool in summer or warm in the winter is a never-ending problem. And then there is the fate of our armed forces trying to keep peace in areas that have never really known peace. I support our troops and hope you do, too.
The chance to legally hunt is a part of our American heritage.
Each year, I deliberately confront myself with the question of why I hunt, and the problems that hunters face. I ask myself: Do I hunt for the meat, which is invariably delicious, to pit desk-weary skills against a wild animal, or do I hunt solely for the kill?
Few hunters I know feel a driving need to personally address such personal questions. Many wander through life turning their back on delicate, psyche-probing questions in favor of immediate gratification with a bow or firearm by killing a wild animal.
For many, the quick kill -- to hell with hunting for a week or two -- is more in tune with today's fast-paced society and is favored by some sportsmen. But, is the quick-kill right or proper? Not for me, it isn't.
That's a question best answered by each individual only after intense soul-searching and addressing the question of why they hunt. We must learn, as human predators of wild animals and birds, to look deep within ourselves to determine just what hunting is and what it means to each of us.
I can't answer those questions for you, and refuse to have you speak for me. Our reasons for hunting may vary, but only the more intelligent and far-thinking of us, will ever know and understand our personal motives.
Man’s social functions of family, home and work place greater demands on people today, and more so than ever before. Peers, whether we like it or not, can force many hunters into the world of the quick kill. Because of business and family commitments, for instance, many hunters don't really have much time to hunt.
Hunting must be managed for the greatest good of the resource, its habitat and its people.
The Department of Natural Resources caters, albeit indirectly and probably unintentionally, to that sort of hunter attitude. It has managed deer, in large part and for many year, for the sake of quantity rather than quality while making a determined effort to keep whitetail deer within reasonable bounds of their environment, food supply and social needs. Deer management has changed, in that this state has many areas that could support more deer. Their management policies in the past several years has been all wrong, and part of the problem is that biologists seldom get out of thw office and into the field to talk to sportsmen.
So, why you hunt or why I hunt is an age-old question that cannot be answered simply with a bland statement that “we like venison" or "we enjoy a few days with the boys.” The meaning is far more deeply rooted. It is buried deep within our ancestry, and goes back to a time when hunting was accepted by those who wanted to eat and when hunting was something everyone did as a matter of necessity.
Today’s sportsmen seldom hunt for food (I do because my family thrives on a wild fish and game diet); instead, perhaps it's a prehistoric feeling or need in each of us to relive our ancestry by hunting for food, for pleasure and for the kill.
The pleasure of today’s hunt is an intangible thing; it's a mix of cool air, sunrises, snow, wood smoke, a hint of winter, being with friends, hunting alone, being outsmarted by a wise old buck, and the kill, although the latter is anticlimactic in most cases.
These are just a few of the reasons why I hunt, but the strongest of all is to pit my skills against those of a wild animal I deeply respect. Yes, I kill deer (I hate the current buzzword "harvest" because we're not harvesting a corn field); we're talking about killing deer and other game animals and birds each year. Although that animal or bird dies by my hand, it gives and sustains my life and that of my family.
My respect for animals, birds and fish is never-ending.
I live through the animals I hunt. I learn about survival because of them. I learn to think more like the predatory animal I've become. I respect each animal and bird's life as much as my own.
Hunting should never be confused solely with killing. One can hunt without killing, although I'm not sure why anyone would choose to do so. We can hunt without ever firing a shot, but we can't be a complete hunter without killing an animal because all predators kill other animals so they may live.
Ortega said it best, and I thoroughly agree with his time-honored statement: "I don't hunt to kill; I kill to have hunted."
How about you?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments are welcome. Please keep them 'on-topic' and cordial. Others besides me read this blog, too. Thanks for your input.